When San
Francisco-based Everett Middle School held its recent school council election,
its principal, Lena Van Haren, refused to release the results, saying she was
concerned that the winners were not diverse enough.
While she would ultimately
relent and release the results, her decision spurred anger among parents and
kids who felt that the principal was putting diversity ahead of democracy.
Critics compared her to a dictator who scraps elections when results don’t go
her way...“The whole school voted for those people, so it is not like people
rigged the game,” seventh-grader Sebastian Kaplan, who had run for class
representative, told KRON 4, yet had no clue a week later if he won. “But in a
way, now it is kinda being rigged.”
The controversy
began as soon as the Oct. 9 election results rolled in. The principal was disturbed
by the lack of diversity among the winners, according to the San Francisco
Chronicle. The school sits in San Francisco’s Mission District, a historically
diverse neighborhood that has recently struggled with both gentrification and
gang violence. Everett is as much a melting pot as the community, with 80
percent of its population comprised of students of color. Only 20 percent of
students are white, Van Haren told KTVU.
So what’s the
problem? An open, fair election was held, candidates openly competed, the
student body voted, their votes were counted, and a disproportionately high
number of non-minority students happened to win.
“It’s not okay
for a school that is really, really diverse to have the student representatives
majority white," the principal told the San Francisco Chronicle. "The
easy thing would have been to announce the results and move on. I intentionally
did not choose the easy way because this is so important.”
So let’s get this
straight. The election results were “not okay," even though it was freely
determined by the diverse students themselves who they wanted as their student
council? What's more important than honest displays of democracy in this case?
Students who had
run for office were left in limbo, wondering if they had won or lost and if it
even mattered anymore. “I wanted to get more involved and change some things,”
Kaplan, the seventh-grader running for class representative, told KRON 4. “I
feel like it is disrespectful to all the people who were running,” he said,
adding he felt discouraged and didn’t really even want to be involved anymore.
As one parent, Todd
David, put it to the Chronicle. “It’s really, really disturbing to me that
withholding the results somehow equals social justice or equity.”
After relenting
and publishing the results -- in which "white, Asian, and mixed-race
students" were statistically over-represented -- the school's (white)
principal pronounced herself "concerned" about whether students'
"voices are all heard.”
Yes, their voices
were heard. Their voices are just under an attempt to be silenced by a
politically correct administrator who seems more obsessed with race than the
students clearly are.
Nevertheless,
said administrator is reportedly considering adding seats or roles to the
student council as an ex post facto means of mitigating this imaginary problem.
It’s too
bad that the principal herself is displaying the typical liberal trait of stonewalling and manipulation when things don’t go their
way. Democracy was alive and well in this school, but liberalism
tried to squelch it under the stifling chains of political correctness.
The bottom line is -- Lena Van Haren, not the vote or the election's outcome -- is the problem. Van Haren should be fired for teaching dishonesty rather than celebrating the
electoral process, which sometimes provides results that disappoint some
people. Heaven knows, I've been disappointed since 2008.
No comments:
Post a Comment