President
Donald Trump has declared today National Sanctity of Human Life Day (fittingly, it is, of
course, also the anniversary of Roe v. Wade).
The White House proclamation says in
part, “Today, we focus our attention on the love and protection each person,
born and unborn, deserves regardless of disability, gender, appearance, or
ethnicity. Much of the greatest suffering in our Nation’s history — and,
indeed, our planet’s history — has been the result of disgracefully misguided
attempts to dehumanize whole classes of people based on these immutable
characteristics. We cannot let this shameful history repeat itself in new
forms, and we must be particularly vigilant to safeguard the most vulnerable
lives among us. This is why we observe National Sanctity of Human Life Day: to
affirm the truth that all life is sacred, that every person has inherent
dignity and worth, and that no class of people should ever be discarded as ‘non-human.’”
The President announced this
proclamation this past Friday, the same day the annual March for Life took
place to protest the Roe v. Wade decision that made abortion legal in all 50
states. While the proclamation was largely well received by the pro-life march
participants, the other “Women’s March”, which took place the next day, did not
lavish so much praise on Trump’s declaration of a National Sanctity of Human
Life Day.
While the women in this protest were
busy hollering for rights that they already have, they showed little interest
in the president’s insistence that all human lives have dignity. After all, to
make that claim is an unspoken acknowledgement that even lives in the womb
matter, and angry women who are protesting about –actually I’m still not sure what they’re
protesting - don’t want to hear the president they despise say all lives
matter. It makes their demand for the right to abortion on demand an
inconvenient contradiction to the president’s claim that all lives have value.
In other words, it gives them one more bit of fodder for despising the president,
because, clearly, to them, not all lives do matter as long as some women
promote the false premise that women are the sole determiners of which lives do matter, e.g. the ones they choose to give birth to.
To them, the president asserting
that all lives matter is just another proof of the misogyny that women despise
him for – while they turn a blind eye to the real louses – the Harvey
Weinsteins and Al Frankens of the world – who actually do devalue women. But to the "Women's March" protesters, protecting human life is a catastrophic threat to their well-being which simply must be stopped.
What a pitiable state we’re in when declaring the worth of every
human life is seen as somehow inequitable and threatening. I think the pink “feline” hats (and the stupid "Handmaid's Tale" bonnets that are a nod to the equally stupid book) have
been pulled over their eyes. These women aren’t seeing a thing except the
darkness that a lying culture of death has wrought upon them.
Julie thinks forcing women to give birth is a sign of equality. You would probably like it if we had government houses where women are there against theire will to just having babies.
ReplyDeleteWell, I am glad that you are at least at the point with your conscience where you recognize that we are talking about a baby and not some blob of tissue.
Delete