Tuesday, January 26, 2016

Left's little darling: Planned Parenthood scores another one for evil

A Texas Grand Jury has ruled in favor of  Planned Parenthood and against the "lead investigator" of the Center for Medical Progress, the group behind the videos exposing PP's selling of freshly deceased babies for profit. Predictably, leftist pro-abortionists cheered and then tauntingly jeered at pro-lifers as only the Left can do.

The CMP lead investigator, David Daleiden will now face charges for two counts: One for “tampering with a governmental record” (felony) and the other for "violation of the state’s prohibition of the purchase and sale of human organs" (misdemeanor).

Aside from the fact that we officially live in a world where the slaughter and selling of innocent, helpless humans is excusable - but the exposing of such evil is not -- those who are so blindly cheering on Planned Parenthood over the Grand Jury decision should take pause. At the very least, they should ask what this means for the future of "citizen-journalism".


As pointed out by journalist Wes Walker, "Suppose this wasn’t a hidden-camera expose on the 'beloved' Planned Parenthood? What if it were an expose on corrupt Banking practices, or illegal mining practices? Something that would be swept under the rug unless it could be shown that the executives themselves were knowingly part of it. What approach besides this one could be used to expose them? And would such journalists — whose sole aim it was to expose these practices — be subject to prosecution for trying to prove they exist? Because that’s what happened here."

The other question is, where was the criminal intent on the part of David Daleiden? He was merely acting as a supposed fetal tissue buyer. He didn’t go through with any actual transaction. He just got Planned Parenthood officials to admit on camera that they themselves engaged in this heinous illegal activity. 


This all sounds like a classic case of personal politics to me. One of the prosecutors in the DA's office involved is purportedly a PP Board Member and PP probably knows Daleiden will never get convicted – but he will likely be bankrupted over this. 

David Daleiden has given his own response to the ruling and its implications. It’s well worth the read. Here is an excerpt:


Planned Parenthood cannot rebut the incriminating statements of its own leadership on these tapes, and so it has resorted to an awkward shuffle of blind denials and stagy distractions in their wake. The truth will continue to come out through the congressional probe, through the ongoing state investigations and through the frivolous lawsuit Planned Parenthood now brings in retaliation for its exposure. The accounting gimmicks I believe Planned Parenthood uses to hide its baby parts sales may pass unnoticed in 24-hour-news-cycle sound bites, but the quality-based specimen payments from fetal tissue vendors who already do all the work of collection and transport are impossible to defend under closer scrutiny. In order to avoid such scrutiny, Planned Parenthood has announced a dubious “policy change” to end these payments. After months of defending them as perfectly legal and appropriate, this seems like an admission of guilt.
Planned Parenthood falsely advertises itself as a vital, mainstream medical organization, when in reality it offers a limited set of basic reproductive health services, which act as a cover for a booming abortion business. This leviathan, subsidized by nearly $500 million taxpayer dollars each year, spends millions in lobbying and electioneering money to prop up its public image and funding streams. The polling data indicate that when the public knows that Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion provider in the country and receives taxpayer funding yet engages in one-sided electioneering and harvests baby parts, even its own supporters turn against it.

My guess is this is a gross misuse of the office and will be thrown out. The fact they indicted the investigator and not Planned Parenthood is the giveaway since, as stated earlier, there was no actual intent to deal in body parts by the investigator, whereas Planned Parenthood clearly demonstrated its actual involvement in dealing in body parts. Then again, Planned Parenthood receives more than a million dollars a day from taxpayers. It's the darling of anti-life liberals who will do anything to protect it. But I have faith that truth and justice will prevail - if not in our time, then surely in God's. 

15 comments:

  1. REPUBLICAN CONVICTS ANTI-ABORTION ACTIVIST

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I guess you're not aware of the fact that not all republicans are pro-life. Pro-lifers know this and we consider them liberals not conservative. Too bad the main point of this has gone right over your head.

      Delete
  2. The main point is Julies wrong and when the right people are found guilty you will see also. Oh I forgot republican never learn as with H and Benghazi Benghazi benghazi.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Can you cite an actual example of where Julie is "wrong"? And sorry, but what does Benghazi have to do with this planned parenthood issue? or were you just trying to cause a distraction from this? that's what it seems like. maybe stick to the issue at hand to prove your point if possible?

      Delete
    2. Where is she wrong?
      1) Planned Parenthood doesn't sell body parts
      2) The two criminals, who falsely claimed to be journalists, broke the law, she claims they didn't.
      3) Julie gives them Carte Blanche to violate state and federal law, claiming journalistic privilege. However, facts happen to be - mainstream journalists would have gone to jail if they would have made false tapes as well. Regular news may take a 4 hour tape and cut it down to a 1-2 minute sound byte - this isn't what these two did. These two deleted information which was factual (we don't make a profit, we don't sell parts, etc), and edited and moved entire phrases around.

      Delete
    3. HAG, must be catching her breath or she might be asking Julie what to do next. Or maybe were done with the fabbracations for now.

      Delete
    4. PP sold body parts. PP’s own research director Melissa Farrell is on record explaining the process for transactions of trafficking human organs within the PP facilities and admitting it was a part of PP’s operational budget. Two criminals? I didn’t hear anything about them being convicted of anything. Are you are referring to the indictments by a prosecutor with a slanted agenda and obvious abuse of the grand jury process? The prosecutor indictment states that the journalist unlawfully, intentionally and knowingly offered to buy human organs, namely, fetal tissue, for valuable consideration. Obviously, the investigative journalists during the course of their investigation never had the “intent” to actually purchase the baby body parts. But why let truth get in the way when you have an agenda. If we are to believe that the reporters are guilty of this charge then why would PP as a purchasing entity in this crime be purposely ignored or not considered culpable? Surely PP should be charged as well since they clearly offered to sell the baby parts and at no point refused to sell the baby parts. Rather they cooperated fully and explained their requirements to facilitate the future transaction. A third-party digital security and forensics company named Coalfire had access to all released audio & video footage and reported that the videos recorded are “authentic and show no evidence of manipulation.” All of the edited content had no bearing to the investigation unless you call commuting, bathroom breaks, etc essential things to know. In the long run I really don’t see how this information will really matter to you much. PP is in the business of murdering unborn children every day so I don’t really see why selling baby body parts would be any sort of ethical conflict for you. If you can accept the killing of a child in the womb then selling the victim’s remains would hold little weight or be of little consequence based on your scale of morals.

      Delete
    5. That is not what I know. "Funny how a lie can get halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes." Julie gives them wings. David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt have been indicted on felony charges for tampering and fraud. Daleiden also charged with misdemeanor charges on trying to buy human organs. Two activist zealots out to advance their agenda and embarrass their opponents by any means necessary, without regard to simple decency or plain truth. Julie, I know the truth must hurt but let Planned Parenthood go about the businessof women's health, give your crusade against them a rest.

      Delete
    6. You really don’t offer any argument other then saying such and such lies. PP in its own letter admitted it has engaged in the transfer of aborted babies’ body parts in exchange for money. Do you deny that? Once again an indictment does not equal a conviction. Did I miss the trial? Oh, I forgot you already decided their guilt based on your legal knowledge and sense of justice. It is laughable when you mention “decency or plain truth” when it comes to defending PP. How can anyone with any shred of honesty describe the leading abortionist organization which murders close to 330,000 babies a year as a business for “women’s health”? You would have to be delusional at best to believe that. Your crusade of death only leads to death of your soul. If you want to kill your conscience so be it but leave the unborn alone.

      Delete
  3. HAG
    Julie has been telling this ferry tail for over a year the republicans for even longer. Just as they have been putting Hillary through the ringer about Benghaza for 3 years. My original post still stands...GRAND JURY CONVICTS ANTI-ABORTION ACTIVIST.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. following this convo...just had to say....and yet you still cannot refute her actual comments above. No wonder Julie doesn't give you the time of day as others have commented before. And your original post, in case you need reminding, was Republicans, not Grand Jury, convicts anti-abortion activist. You don't even stand up to your own scrutiny :o) Good of you to try though!

      Delete
    2. Read what Gaynon Christian has to say about Julie's missinformation. He got it from the real newspaper not this funny page.

      Delete
  4. And Julie's silence is deafening. She appears to have a problem with coping with the truth.

    No one is cheering now, and the only group that cheered before was Julie and her minions, when the lies first hit. Sorry - didn't happen, never happened. Read the papers, read the ruling. Julie, you LOST.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, yes the video exposing Planned Barrenhood was a total fake. And those old videos showing Auschwitz, Belzec, Chelmno, Janowska, etc were all obviously altered as well. Thank goodness you uncovered all the lies and opened our eyes. And what “evidence” did you provide to support any of your mindless dribble? You should have worked for Joseph Goebbel. Sieg Heil to you and your mindless lackies.

      Delete
    2. Gaynon,
      Isn't she everything I said she was. If you turn up the heat on her she will plug the plug, so her readers say. Mark

      Delete